This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Register classes


Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:

> On Aug 19, 2004, at 8:56 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >
> >> Just so nobody has any doubts, i have no current plans to do
> >> anything to
> >> the register allocator. I'm just trying to gather more information in
> >> case i decide to mount another future assault on it.
> >>
> >> I should point out something from the below paper though:
> >
> > As this paper didn't yet show up in citeseer (it seems), I would be
> > thankful for this paper.
> >
> I'll send it to you.
> 
> > Note that new-ra does not really use register classes for the
> > interference
> > graph, but instead register sets.
> >
> Except they are taken from register classes.

The register sets are taken from register classes and new-ra use
register sets for interference graph. Even more new-ra tracks useless
conflicts. This is conflicts between webs with nonintersected
register sets but intersected live ranges.

Denis.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]