This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
There is one compiler that produces a perfect score on Paranoia: No
failures, defects, or flaws.
GCC 3.5, on my Opteron system.
Compiled with -march=opteron, GCC 3.5 has a perfect paranoia score.
Adding -O3 does *not* introduce any errors on the Opteron; adding
-ffast-math results in a *single* minor "flaw".
Last week I was at meeting 169 of J3, the Fortran Standardization body.
During that meeting I had a discussion about support for floating point
computations by ICC and GCC. It turns out that ICC uses both the
multimedia floating point instructions *and* the old ix87 ones.
As far as I know, on AMD64, GCC only uses the multimedia ones.
That might explain the difference.
--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/
- References:
- GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004
- Re: GCC Benchmarks (coybench), AMD64 and i686, 14 August 2004