This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
More Q's regarding gimplification
- From: neroden at fastmail dot fm (Nathanael Nerode)
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:27:29 -0400
- Subject: More Q's regarding gimplification
gimple_predicate
rhs_predicate_for (tree lhs)
{
if (is_gimple_tmp_var (lhs))
return is_gimple_tmp_rhs;
else if (is_gimple_reg (lhs))
return is_gimple_reg_rhs;
else
return is_gimple_mem_rhs;
}
The question is this:
Is it supposed to be possible to have
is_gimple_tmp_var(lhs) && !is_gimple_reg(lhs)
or is
is_gimple_tmp_var
supposed to imply
is_gimple_reg?
If the latter, then my job here is simpler...
--
This space intentionally left blank.