This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:47:18 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
References: <10408112118.AA03238@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <411A8F9A.8030403@codesourcery.com>

On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 02:28:58PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> The Stage 3 threshold is really pretty low: you have to fix some bug 
> somewhere.

Provided that "produces significantly worse code than 3.4" is considered a
bug, I have no problem with the criterion.  We already have evidence that
many C++ codes will come out a good deal faster with 3.5, but we still
have some performance regressions.

References:
- Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: GCC Status (2004-08-09)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]