This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Support COMDAT group

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at superh dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:50:59 -0700
Subject: Support COMDAT group
References: <200408021422.i72EMvC02718@chloe.uk.w2k.superh.com> <410EA15A.1050500@codesourcery.com>

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:17:30PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
> In the case that the associated function is weak, you cannot (since GCC 
> does not really do COMDAT groups) assume that the thunks will be "near" 
> the associated function; they will still be in separate .gnu.linkonce 
> sections.
> 

FYI, I posted a patch to support COMDAT group at:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg01047.html



H.J.

References:
- Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunk with -fPIC (fwd))
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: Quo vadis, thunk? (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/16665: SH thunkwith -fPIC (fwd))
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]