This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
On Sad, 2004-07-31 at 01:35, Matt Taggart wrote:
> It's my understanding that the LSB spec is dynamically generated from a
> database of interfaces that itself was generated from a gcc 3.3.3 version
> of libstdc++ and some other tools that extract information about the
> interfaces of that implementation. Assuming that's the case, it should
> exactly match the gcc 3.3.3 implementation. If not then something is wrong.
Then something is wrong because there is a gcc 3.3.5 patch submission to
make the compiler do what the LSB spec believes to be "correct".
I think however you are talking about C++ class library symbols not the
ABI ?