This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 10:35, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> >> Given these developments, I think the FSG might want to re-think some of
> >> their previous assumptions. If this means delaying the C++ bits of LSB
> >> 2.0, then I think that is a step that should be honestly considered.
> >> It's far better to have no specification than a flawed one.
> >Maybe that's the recommendation we (the GCC developers) should make
> >to FSG/LSB. Delay the C++ bits until we can reach some kind of
> >agreement on what the right bits for the standard ought to be.
> Sounds good to me.
> However, Ted Tso has proposed this already to the LSB working group. See:
Well, we can still make the recommendation. It's up to the
FSG/LSB people to decide what to do with that recommendation.