This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1

From: Matt Taggart <taggart at carmen dot fc dot hp dot com>
To: anderson at freestandards dot org
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, lsb-wg at freestandards dot org
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:30:08 -0600
Subject: Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
References: <20040729111335.57e712fd.bkoz@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407291552020.21442@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com>

anderson@freestandards.org writes...

> It would not be possible to release an LSB aligned with gcc 3.4 at this
> time as it does not meet the rest of our release criteria, which can be
> found on our website at http://www.linuxbase.org/futures/criteria/index.html.

We're tracking the status of both the v5 and v6 ABIs wrt these criteria at,

http://www.linuxbase.org/futures/candidates/c++/
http://www.linuxbase.org/futures/candidates/c++v6/

The main thing holding up the v6 ABI is adoption by the distros.

-- 
Matt Taggart        Linux and Open Source Lab
taggart@fc.hp.com   Hewlett-Packard

References:
- opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1
  - From: anderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]