This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: memory predicates and constraints

Hi,

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Richard Henderson wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 02:42:03AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > Where is the problem to use "m" instead of "QU<>" (with various 
> > alternatives), when at the time we get to reload the operand has already a 
> > correct mode for a memory_operand?
> 
> I don't know for sure.  But I stand by my claim.

Would a new (probably multi character) constraint via EXTRA_CONSTRAINT_STR 
be an option, which behaves different depending on the target?

bye, Roman
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]