This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Make attribute functions pure

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
To: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 01:47:34 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make attribute functions pure
References: <10407231255.AA27336@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <20040723111335.GU30497@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <1090602836.10860.205.camel@pc.site> <41041E96.6050802@gnat.com> <1090790073.6580.18.camel@pc.site> <410426E2.1030302@gnat.com> <87pt6j92ad.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <1090794895.6580.43.camel@pc.site>

Laurent GUERBY wrote:

Interesting it doesn't mention the only interesting (read: portable) one
which is using the Import pragma. I quickly checked, and
calling an Imported subprogram doesn't mentionned as being
an external effect, I believe it should be. Did I miss
something?


No, this usage was sommething that was simply not anticipated,
and indeed there was some sentiment to remove this capability :-)

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Make attribute functions pure
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: [PATCH] Make attribute functions pure
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Make attribute functions pure
  - From: Laurent GUERBY
- Re: [PATCH] Make attribute functions pure
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: [PATCH] Make attribute functions pure
  - From: Laurent GUERBY
- Re: [PATCH] Make attribute functions pure
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: [PATCH] Make attribute functions pure
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] Make attribute functions pure
  - From: Laurent GUERBY

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]