This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Why do call-clobbered local variables make the function not suitable for tail call optimization?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jie Zhang <zhangjie at magima dot com dot cn>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:49:40 -0700
Subject: Re: Why do call-clobbered local variables make the function not suitable for tail call optimization?
References: <40FCD931.8000606@magima.com.cn> <20040720184442.GA20301@redhat.com> <40FE058A.6030309@magima.com.cn>

On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:56:26PM +0800, Jie Zhang wrote:
> Thanks. Then how about tail recursion optimization? Why is it also 
> prevented by call-clobbered local variables?

A similar argument.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why do call-clobbered local variables make the function not suitablefor tail call optimization?
  - From: Jie Zhang

References:
- Why do call-clobbered local variables make the function not suitablefor tail call optimization?
  - From: Jie Zhang
- Re: Why do call-clobbered local variables make the function not suitable for tail call optimization?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Why do call-clobbered local variables make the function not suitablefor tail call optimization?
  - From: Jie Zhang

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]