This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: named warnings & individual warning control

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:34:10 -0400
Subject: Re: named warnings & individual warning control
References: <200406211908.i5LJ8mCX027121@greed.delorie.com> <40D7CF2B.2030405@codesourcery.com> <200406221400.i5ME0QjE002663@greed.delorie.com> <40D85A29.9070503@codesourcery.com> <200406221714.i5MHEM6i005590@greed.delorie.com> <40D86E05.8070805@codesourcery.com> <200406221850.i5MIo2S0007045@greed.delorie.com> <40D88578.6080306@codesourcery.com> <200406242210.i5OMAwbp023722@greed.delorie.com> <40DBB1D7.6070108@codesourcery.com> <200406282056.i5SKu4oL029790@greed.delorie.com> <200407012126.i61LQfvU001865@greed.delorie.com> <40E576FF.6080807@codesourcery.com> <200407021610.i62GAMLG011936@greed.delorie.com> <200407022142.i62LgkDW025193@greed.delorie.com>

Anyone?

> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:42:46 -0400
> From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
>
> > The initial patch (mechanically adding "0" to all calls) is going to
> > be HUGE.
> 
> And I was right.  147 files changed, 2678 calls, 32,723 line patch
> (1Mb).  Should I omit the mechanical foo( -> foo(0, portions of the
> patch, post the whole thing, put it on a web site somewhere, or what?

References:
- Re: named warnings & individual warning control
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: named warnings & individual warning control
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: named warnings & individual warning control
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: named warnings & individual warning control
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]