This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Converting GCC to compilation with C++


Richard Kenner:
>     If we ever happen to agree on using a subset of C++ (which, according
>     to last report is not going to happen anytime soon) and we agree on
>     not using MI (that is a big if), then we could manage to enforce its
>     detection through a -W option.
>
> Fair enough, but that's not what you said originally.  I strongly agree
> with automatic procedures to address code quality issues, but you
> were originally planning to rely on the review process to do that,
> and that was what I was objecting to.

There is a difference between automatically diagnosing forbidden
features and assessing code quality.

Not just because a patch is written in C means it is
of good quality.  Isn't it?

-- Gaby



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]