This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: export CC=g++ ; make configure ; make

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: gdr at acm dot org
Cc: mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:10:15 -0400
Subject: Re: export CC=g++ ; make configure ; make
References: <20040713183118.48FF34B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <200407131847.i6DIlp92021197@greed.delorie.com> <33222.::ffff:24.250.169.187.1089744716.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net>

> Yes, but when included in project where __cplusplus is defined
> should we not expect the "right" declarations?  I take it obvious
> that the header are appropriately decorated with extern "C" calling
> convention specification.

There's two different goals here:

1. Making libiberty headers support C++ so that you can build *other*
   projects with a C++ compiler.

2. Building libiberty itself with a C++ compiler.

There have been recent patches to address #1, but mec was talking
about #2.

References:
- export CC=g++ ; make configure ; make
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: export CC=g++ ; make configure ; make
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: export CC=g++ ; make configure ; make
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]