This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Library version and C++ ABI information in Release Notes
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- Cc: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:54:23 -0400
- Subject: Re: Library version and C++ ABI information in Release Notes
- References: <200407071929.i67JT9D28092@makai.watson.ibm.com> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0407101316430.99188@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 09:17:36PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > When trying to look up information about C++ ABI and libstdc++
> > library major version numbers in various GCC releases, I noticed that this
> > is not mentioned in the Release Notes nor on the GCC website.
> >
> > What would be even nicer is a link to the appropriate mailinglist
> > discussion describing the change.
> >
> > Would it be possible to include this information in future Release
> > Notes and in the release changes page?
>
> I think this is an excellent suggestion. In the future I'll watch out
> for ABI changing C++ patches and will link them from the respective
> changes.html page. Janis, would you mind also keeping an eye on that? ;-)
>
> If the libstdc++ folks could provide as a pointer whenever the change
> the ABI, that would be great as well.
I have not been following this thread, but does any of this help:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/abi.html
?
--
AI.cpp:33241: warning: You wrote 'neurons.merge(solution1, solution2)",
AI.cpp:33241: you probably MEANT "neurons->merge(solution1, solution2)",
AI.cpp:33241: but there is a MUCH better way to implement this whole
AI.cpp:33241: function; doing that instead.