This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc test results question
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at codesourcery dot com>
- To: "David P. Riedel" <driedel at cox dot net>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 20:51:28 -0400
- Subject: Re: gcc test results question
- References: <200407062008.26678.driedel@cox.net>
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 08:08:26PM -0400, David P. Riedel wrote:
> the test results posted at:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-07/msg00070.html
>
> show a large number (63) of unexpected failures. is this still considered a
> 'good' compiler suitable for building production code? i see a similar
> number of unexpected failures for the athlon-mp on my system.
Depends on what those tests are testing, and when they started failing.
--
Behind everything some further thing is found, forever; thus the tree behind
the bird, stone beneath soil, the sun behind Urth. Behind our efforts, let
there be found our efforts.
- Ascian saying, as related by Loyal to the Group of Seventeen