This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: g++.dg/ext/stmtexpr2.C failure
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: Ulrich Weigand <weigand at i1 dot informatik dot uni-erlangen dot de>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:46:20 -0400
- Subject: Re: g++.dg/ext/stmtexpr2.C failure
- References: <200406242124.XAA09458@faui1m.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:24:56 +0200 (CEST), Ulrich Weigand <weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> the g++.dg/ext/stmtexpr2.C case you added 2004-06-18 fails on s390,
> because the test assumes that in the expression
> ({ A(10) + A(11); });
> the constructor A(11) must be called before A(10). However, on s390
> current mainline emits constructor calls in the other order. Does
> C++ really require this particular order, or is this a testcase bug?
Testcase bug, sorry.
Jason