This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS vs STATEMENT_LIST vs recompute_side_effects

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: law at redhat dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 04 14:42:17 EDT
Subject: Re: TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS vs STATEMENT_LIST vs recompute_side_effects

    The deeper issue is in this case the bit propagates up through
    the COND_EXPR, eventually to a COMPONENT_REF.

OK, so you're talking about the case of a non-void-type COND_EXPR, then?

But in that case, the arms will be replaced with variables, not GOTO_EXPRs.
Why are side effects being recomputed then?

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]