This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at polimi dot it>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 16:01:35 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)
References: <40B126A9.7020802@codesourcery.com> <c8saq8$cgl$1@sea.gmane.org> <40B1B65B.7010408@gnu.org> <20040524134555.GB3636@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

I would actually like to merge the main expansion changes from
tree-profiling.  I believe they are resonably stable now and works as
expected.

Yes, that's seems like a good idea if we're focusing on removing RTL passes.

It was actually past me why these were not accepted together with the other gimple-low changes -- did/do they cause any regression?

> old loop is retired (or

updated to keep CFG in shape - possible backup plan I would preffer to
not realize ;)

No please... there's so much code in integrate.c waiting for the old loop optimizer to go away.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]