This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -masm=intel examples

From: llewelly at xmission dot com
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
Cc: Marek Peteraj <marpet at naex dot sk>, Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 15 May 2004 08:16:49 -0600
Subject: Re: -masm=intel examples
References: <1084619786.31026.6.camel@Gentoo> <87sme253pv.fsf@deneb.enyo.de><1084631003.23240.3.camel@Gentoo> <40A61710.4090408@gnat.com>

Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> writes:

> Marek Peteraj wrote:
> 
> > Are there any plans to change this? The example i've mentioned in my
> > previous mail seems much more readable than a printf() style inline asm.
> > It would also make porting much more simple and painless.
> 
> Definitely sounds useful. Perhaps you should try to make this
> improvement yourself! I don't know of anyone else interested
> in working on this.

Wasn't this mentioned briefly in the loong thread about CW-style asm
    syntax?

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-05/msg00070.html

References:
- -masm=intel examples
  - From: Marek Peteraj
- Re: -masm=intel examples
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: -masm=intel examples
  - From: Marek Peteraj
- Re: -masm=intel examples
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]