This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
Cc: Gunther Nikl <gni at gecko dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 13:42:48 -0700
Subject: Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5
References: <20040512154332.GA94251@lorien.int.gecko.de> <m31xlpzkrm.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20040512182146.GB12263@redhat.com> <m3isf1wl11.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:35:54PM -0400, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> And it doesn't appear to work.

It *does* work on other systems.  We have tests for it in the
testsuite, and glibc would fail to work if it didn't.

> I can recreate the problem using A4.  It doesn't have anything to do
> with the frame pointer.

File a bug then.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5
  - From: Gunther Nikl
- Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]