This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: savannah trailing sources?
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Matthew Galgoci <mgalgoci at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Christopher Faylor <cgf at alum dot bu dot edu>, overseers at gcc dot gnu dot org, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 19:54:21 -0700
- Subject: Re: savannah trailing sources?
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405092243030.15280-100000@lacrosse.corp.redhat.com>
Matthew Galgoci <mgalgoci@redhat.com> writes:
>> >;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> >gcc.gnu.org. 86400 IN A 12.107.209.250
>> >
>> >But, I'm guessing this isn't under your control either. The TTL of
>> >sources.redhat.com is much more sane.
>>
>> I don't control the domain info for either, actually. I do control
>> cygwin.com, FWIW.
>
> If you want the ttl turned down for gcc.gnu.org I think I might be alble
> to arrange it.
>
> 3600 sounds about right.
It hardly seems worthwhile _now_. A day is a reasonable TTL when the
system isn't about to be moved IMHO - it should be dropped to an hour
or so, twenty-four hours _before_ the move, and then put back up
afterward.
Alternatively I think tinydns has a "this record will expire at
absolute time X, set TTLs accordingly" feature.
zw