Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend

[Rogelio Serrano <rogelio at smsglobal dot net>]

Hi

Is cross compilation good enough as a test setup? Im writing 
code for a dragonball embedded board.


On 2004-05-07 15:43:56 +0800 Kazu Hirata <kazu@cs.umass.edu> 
wrote:

> Hi Giovanni,
>
> > > One thing that would be nice to have is to convert the
> > > prologue/epilogue to RTL.
>
> This sounds like a good idea.
>
> > Also, m68k is the major cc0 target at the moment. Making it 
> > drop cc0 support
> > would help cleaning up the compiler. You can ask Kazu Hirata, 
> > as he lately
> > modified h8300 to drop cc0.
>
> As Paolo pointed out, I have not checked in this change.  I am
> thinking about doing so after the tree-ssa merge, provided that
> somebody will review my middle-end patches that aim at 
> preserving the
> code quality when the h8300 port moves from cc0 to MODE_CC.
>
> By the way, I am wondering if there is anybody out there 
> testing the
> m68k port on some kind of simulator.  Without that, making a 
> large
> change to the port would be very difficult.
>
> Kazu Hirata