This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison
On Wednesday 05 May 2004 20:41, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Using the suggested -fno-gcse -fno-cse-follow-jumps -fno-cse-skip-blocks
> -fno-web, -O2 compilation times improve about 8%. This leaves us with
Why not -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks? And -fweb is enabled on mainline
and helps tree-ssa iirc, so that should really stay enabled...
> 10% to improve elsewhere (I guess, f.i. preserving the CFG could help,
> as well as removing some first invocations of CSE).
As well as disabling some stuff hidden behind -fexpensive-optimizations,
and investigating if we really need to call delete_trivially_dead_insns
so many times (and iteratively, see cfgcleanup!). And some other stuff
like addressof, as discussed here some time ago. There are still a lot
of things we have to try...