This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Karel Gardas <kgardas at objectsecurity dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 17:38:22 -0400
Subject: Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03
References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0405042327020.13381-100000@thinkpad.gardas.net>

On May 4, 2004, at 5:28 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Daniel Berlin wrote:
These were without checking enabled on both compilers, right?
(Checking is more expensive on tree-ssa than with mainline)
Sure! I've made this mistake just once! :-)

Oh, just checking. In that case, can you tar up the -ftime-report's and throw them somewhere, so we can get a feel for what is taking up the most time?

References:
- Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03
  - From: Karel Gardas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]