This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-24
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:44:40 -0700
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-24
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <1080318686.4600.141.camel@localhost.localdomain>, Diego Novillo wri
tes:
>
>Bootstrapped and tested x86, x86-64 and alpha. We have new c-torture
>regressions that are not present in mainline:
>
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2c.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2d.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
>
>20040313-1.c is the test case for PR 14470. The two loop failures
>happen only at -Os on x86, it does not seem to be a tree optimizer
>failure because we emit the same trees. I'm looking at those today.
>The builtin-nonneg failure is another case of tree-ssa not folding
>builtins properly.
>
>None of the failures seemed important enough to hold the merge which was
>already getting old.
Agreed.
jeff