This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org list" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:00:58 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <086B964A-7EC5-11D8-8C7F-000A95D7CD40@apple.com> <1080264779.4600.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <045E0A00-7EC9-11D8-8C7F-000A95D7CD40@apple.com>

On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 20:58, Dale Johannesen wrote:

> > Are maxmin_Result the same variable?  Use -uid to find out.
> 
> How?  Doesn't like that as a command line option...
> 
Sorry.  I meant -fdump-tree-...  I usually just say,
-fdump-tree-all-vops-uid (to get both virtual operands and UIDs dumped).


> They are the same VAR_DECL (pointed to from different SSA_NAMEs).
> Is it one of the UIDs in there that matters, or the one in the PHI?
> 
If the UIDs are different, then they are different VAR_DECLs, but if
you've already tested that they are the same VAR_DECL pointer, then I
guess we have a bug.  Mind opening a PR?


Diego.

References:
- [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
  - From: Dale Johannesen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]