This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, Bradley Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>, roger at eyesopen dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, abraham at dina dot kvl dot dk, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl, laurent at guerby dot net, fjahanian at apple dot com
Date: 25 Mar 2004 06:33:58 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <13661448-7DC0-11D8-817F-000A958F150A@math.purdue.edu><20040324105146.A1279@synopsys.com><EDB6EC7E-7DC4-11D8-817F-000A958F150A@math.purdue.edu><20040324110433.A2050@synopsys.com> <40626F6F.5000102@gnat.com>

Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> writes:

| I dislike anything being called an optimization, unsafe or not, when it
| is not an optimization but in fact a distortion of required language
| semantics.

In the past, I've argued along the same line and proposed we speak in
terms of "transformations". 

-- Gaby

References:
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Bradley Lucier
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Bradley Lucier
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]