This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops

From: Geert Bosch <bosch at gnat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>,Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:50:36 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
References: <20040318122130.GA24448@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200403181331.57192.stevenb@suse.de> <1079620299.32455.186.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040318162641.GB16810@redhat.com>

On Mar 18, 2004, at 11:26, Richard Henderson wrote:

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:31:39AM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
I've always hated this custom.  Is this a language mandate?  Or just
"we've always done it this way"?
The later. Lets stop this madness.


Richard, Diego was talking about removing infinite loops.
Of course this is an invalid transformation and I'm surprised
that anyone would think otherwise. Whether a program halts or
not  is the fundamental outcome of running it.

-Geert

References:
- [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]