This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: LNO Branch merge proposal

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:10:56 -0800
Subject: Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
References: <200403171923.i2HJN9T35164@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20040317210543.GA9779@redhat.com> <200403172155.i2HLtnT31870@makai.watson.ibm.com>

> 	As long as we do not arbitrarily cut off patches for GCC 3.5
> before all LNO work has been reviewed and merged, there probably is little
> difference.  LNO presumably would be reviewed in pieces anyway.

"Reviewed and merged if accepted". It's a fine point, but putting a
requirement on 3.5 that depends on code that hasn't had any major review
is perhaps a bit unwise.

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>

References:
- LNO Branch merge proposal
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]