This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!

From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham at dina dot kvl dot dk>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:55:16 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
Organization: The Church of Emacs
References: <20040315160650.7DFD7F2D9C@nile.gnat.com> <rj8yi19o5r.fsf@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk><405796BF.9090405@gnat.com> <rjy8pzhb0u.fsf@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk><m3vfl37bs6.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:

> Calling a transformation an "optimization" before it is proven an
> optimization is a serious semantic hole that undermines many
> reasonings in that department.

Likely true, as I don't understand a word of it.  If my wording was
improper, pretend it was phrased in the terminology of your
preference.

References:
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Per Abrahamsen
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Per Abrahamsen
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]