This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Building collect2 for C?


"E. Weddington" <eric@ecentral.com> writes:

> On 16 Mar 2004 at 9:59, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> 
> > "E. Weddington" <eric@ecentral.com> writes:
> > 
> > > In my mind, this implies that collect2 is only necessary for compiling C++,
> > > and not necessary for C. Is this correct?
> > 
> > Yes.
> 
> On 16 Mar 2004 at 9:07, David Edelsohn wrote:
>  
> >  GCC C code can include constructors, destructors, and exception
> > handling frames.
> 
> Which is it then?

David is right and I am wrong.  I forgot about gcc extensions.

> No, not really. The real bug that I'm trying to work around is 14316 above. 
> 14316 contains a link to a discussion from over a year ago between Zack and DJ 
> about Zack's proposed patch. I don't fully understand the reasons DJ gave for 
> blocking that patch: I can't tell from that discussion whether it's an 
> objection based on libiberty itself, or an objection based on that the proposed 
> patch doesn't work for DJGPP. 

Zack's patch is, in my opinion, poorly written.  I pointed out the
right way to do it a while back.

Since this came up again, I'm working on what I consider to be a
correct patch.  I'll send it out later today.

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]