This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:31:50 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
References: <4054ED19.8020009@coyotegulch.com> <64F82240-7615-11D8-8086-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu> <405592D6.3060200@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini wrote:

In the meanwhile we have learned that the real reason why Icc performs
better then mainline gcc is the use of an iterative SSE instruction
(see Dan Nicolaescu message).

+ the <math.h> interesting issue, of course, but the real point of my message was the other one.

Paolo.

References:
- GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]