This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>, Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 09:49:11 -0800
Subject: Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <200403030305.i2335S8S028779@sirius.codesourcery.com> <1078297307.3616.8.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com> <1078301718.8820.129.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org> <8765dmuhzv.fsf@redhat.com>

Richard Sandiford wrote:

I suggest reverting it, waiting to see what breaks, and then properly
documenting the problem that the patch supposedly fixes.
Gets my vote too. I see no reason to test N % FP_INC or mips_abi here. When using paired 32-bit registers, if a double argument is passed in $f12, $f13 is used as well.

I agree.

Richard, are you in a position to test the change thoroughly?

Or shall I just check it in as an obvious fix?

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com

References:
- Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
  - From: Richard Sandiford

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]