This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?

From: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 03 Mar 2004 00:03:55 -0800
Subject: Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
References: <200403030305.i2335S8S028779@sirius.codesourcery.com><1078297307.3616.8.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com><40458861.20301@codesourcery.com> <20040303074811.GA8118@redhat.com>

On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 23:48, Richard Henderson wrote:
> O64 has no official document describing it.  It is effectively defined by
> the macros in gcc.  I would strongly recommend against changing anything.

And we should be trying to obsolete it, as we have n32 and EABI now
which do have documents describing them.
-- 
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
  - From: Eric Christopher

References:
- Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]