This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Gunther Nikl <gni at gecko dot de>
Cc: Richard Zidlicky <rz at linux-m68k dot org>, Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at develer dot com>, peter at baradas dot org, Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:19:25 -0800
Subject: Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
References: <4009E670.5090600@develer.com> <16394.22429.131429.162236@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <m31xpxs6wx.fsf@whitebox.m5r.de> <20040301200553.GA4188@linux-m68k.org> <20040301215409.GA18138@linux-m68k.org> <4043D2EB.1050602@develer.com> <20040302085305.GA1482@linux-m68k.org> <20040302104300.GA23887@lorien.int.gecko.de>

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:43:00AM +0100, Gunther Nikl wrote:
> > I am pretty sure more it results in more damage later on.
> 
>   Yes, that looks like a bug. i386.h has "argptr" included in
>   FIXED_REGISTERS and gives it a nonzero value.

Yes.  There are three such arrays that *must* include *all*
registers, including such special purpose registers.

r~

References:
- Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
  - From: Richard Zidlicky
- Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
  - From: Richard Zidlicky
- Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
  - From: Richard Zidlicky
- Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
  - From: Gunther Nikl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]