This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization
On Feb 18, 2004, at 1:44 PM, Devang Patel wrote:
On Feb 17, 2004, at 8:32 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
In the meantime, why not clean up the DDG GTY'ing mess, or use loop
versioning somewhere?
Because before completing new implementation or starting to use new
features in vectorizer it is important to fix regressions in
vectorizer.
Then shouldn't this have been done before committing more code that
isn't used yet?
Why commit the messy version of the DDG, for example, instead of fixing
regressions, if you are just going to end up undoing a lot of the DDG
changes?
I'm all for fixing bugs and regressions, but it seems a bit silly to
introduce unused code, then leave it sit for weeks while fixing other
bugs. It just makes merges harder.
Right now all tree-ssa-vect tests fail on powerpc-darwin.