Re: -shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc

["Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>]

Matt Austern <austern@apple.com> writes:

> That's basically what I was hinting, yes: that this was a case where
> it would make more sense to have a single flag with a -no-* option,
> which is what we normally do if we're making a choice between
> "do this", "don't do this", and "do this or not, whatever is the
> default".

Ah, ok.  I think the answer to that question is "well, maybe, but it's
too late to change it now."

> But that's mostly a nitpick.  Mostly I just wanted to confirm that I
> was right, that either we've got shared-libgcc or we don't, and that
> I don't have to worry about weird corner cases where we might
> have both or neither.

Yeah.

zw