This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: "Documentation by paper"

From: Jamie Lokier <jamie at shareable dot org>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: Kai Henningsen <kaih at khms dot westfalen dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:30:55 +0000
Subject: Re: "Documentation by paper"
References: <20040208062304.GB25666@mail.shareable.org> <D85EDBE8-5B2A-11D8-ABD3-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <4027CDBB.4040205@gnat.com> <4027CDBB.4040205@gnat.com> <67F3F3F9-5B2D-11D8-ABD3-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <92cJ$$ZXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> <26BB5B46-5C08-11D8-83BD-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org>

Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Someone mentioned something that wasn't related to the thread, which is 
> that they thought they read in a paper that a certain algorithm 
> required useless phi nodes.
> I responded that I had provided evidence to contradict this.

You have not provided such evidence.

What makes you think we read the same paper or the same algorithm?

-- Jamie

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Documentation by paper"
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Re: "Documentation by paper"
  - From: Jamie Lokier
- Re: "Documentation by paper"
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: "Documentation by paper"
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: "Documentation by paper"
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: "Documentation by paper"
  - From: Kai Henningsen
- Re: "Documentation by paper"
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]