This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa


On Friday 06 February 2004 00:24, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Compile Time Performance
> > ------------------------
> >
> >   - Bootstrap times within 1-5% of mainline.
> >
> >   - POOMA, DLV and MICO compile times within 1-5% of mainline.
> >
> >   - Memory consumption within 1-5% of mainline (POOMA, DLV and
> >     MICO seem good tests).
>
> All these tests hits inline limits.  For instance the tree-ssa estimate
> gerald's testcase to 160000 instruction, while mainline to 140000
> instructions.  THat means that tree-ssa happens to inline fewer
> functions so you get kind of apples-to-orranges comparsion.

So we need to calibrate the estimate_insn function for GIMPLE trees?

Gr.
Steven


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]