This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was:Re: "Documentation by paper")

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>,Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,dnovillo at redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 21:28:15 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was:Re: "Documentation by paper")
References: <10402042108.AA03894@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <200402042233.21614.stevenb@suse.de> <20040204145813.A26606@synopsys.com>

Joe Buck wrote:

I could take a shot at a review for language.  Someone like Kenner would
be better suited than me to do a review for usability (by a front end
maintainer who must interface with tree-ssa), but if he doesn't want to
my review will be better than nothing.

I didn't see Richard say he would not review it, just that he would be happier if the documentation was in the source code (a view I share, but I am sure Richard agrees that doc in the doc is better than no doc at all :-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper")
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper")
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper")
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper")
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]