This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Anonymous Namespaces

From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot dot org>
To: espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr
Cc: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:28:35 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: Anonymous Namespaces

Marc Espie wrote:
> Now, if anonymous namespaces don't allow us the same potential
> optimization that static used to, what I've been told is completely
> wrong.
> Is this a foresight from the standard, a weird implementation choice
> of gcc, a misconception on my part or what ?

This is a weird implementation choice of GCC.  LLVM, and probably other
compilers, do not have this bug.  Hopefully it will be resolved though!

-Chris

-- 
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]