This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:44:45 -0600
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions
In message <20031017212058.GE26035@kam.mff.cuni.cz>, Jan Hubicka writes:
>> In message <20031017190337.GF15904@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>, Jan Hubicka w
>rite
>> s:
>> >> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:57:47PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >> > Also can I ask about the status of your changes in tree-ssa? (it loo
>ks
>> >> > like they are responsible for the new misscompilations I am seeing wi
>th
>> >> > unit-at-a-time enabled. I will look into these in case you don't hav
>e
>> >> > something ready already)
>> >>
>> >> It's looking generally good. I'm sure there are bugs, but they're
>> >> not overwhelming.
>> >I actually was referring to Jeff's changes from this week,
>> Which specifically? I need specifics to be able to address any problems.
>
>Except for the uninitialized variables, I am seeing misscopmilation of
>read_rtx with unit-at-a-time enabled. This is really funny one.
>read_rtx does call read_name that gets inlined as called one.
You're missing my point. I need testcases! This is especially true
since none of my changes this month should be effecting code generation!
Jeff