This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions
- From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
- To: law at redhat dot com
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>,gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 21:20:41 +0200
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions
- References: <20031017190337.GF15904@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200310171918.h9HJIAlW012661@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
> In message <20031017190337.GF15904@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>, Jan Hubicka write
> s:
> >> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:57:47PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> > Also can I ask about the status of your changes in tree-ssa? (it looks
> >> > like they are responsible for the new misscompilations I am seeing with
> >> > unit-at-a-time enabled. I will look into these in case you don't have
> >> > something ready already)
> >>
> >> It's looking generally good. I'm sure there are bugs, but they're
> >> not overwhelming.
> >I actually was referring to Jeff's changes from this week,
> Which specifically? I need specifics to be able to address any problems.
Ok, my problem is that after uncommenting flag_unit_at_a_time setting in
opts.c, I get failure on unused variable warning in stage2, when I work
around I get misscompilation of genconstants at stage3. These are from
last week. I am just looking into the unused variable issue now.
Honza
>
> jeff