This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] bug analysis for 20000603-1.c
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, dnovillo at redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:56:53 -0600
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] bug analysis for 20000603-1.c
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <20031014073000.GB27340@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson writes:
>On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 07:45:22PM -0600, law@redhat.com wrote:
>> >Well, mind sharing with us what other test cases have also already been
>> >analyzed, so there's not too much duplication of effort?
>> Well, I know what the tree-ssa.exp failures are since I cobbled together
>> most of those tests. I think everyone else just ignores them :-)
>
>I've been trying to work the last two weeks or so fixing or
>xfailing all of them. We really need to be able to tell at
>a glance whether a patch causes a regression.
I won't disagree at all. Each merge has tended to bring in new tests
which fail for one reason or another. We tend to hit a critical mass of
failures, then someone (Diego, myself, now you) goes through and nails as
many as they can and the cycle starts again.
It's one of the reasons why I think it's critical that we be focused on the
goal of getting this work into the mainline sources. :-)
jeff