This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Moving to GNU Compiler from CAD-UL
- From: Bernd Jendrissek <berndfoobar at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- To: Ahu Unalan <aunalan at netas dot com dot tr>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:09:27 +0200
- Subject: Re: Moving to GNU Compiler from CAD-UL
- References: <3F82749C.94ACBCF8@netas.com.tr>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:09:00AM +0300, Ahu Unalan wrote:
> We are planning to migrate from CAD-UL to GNU compiler. I would like to
>
> learn that GNU supports Intel 80188-80186 CPU's as target.
Strange that you should ask. My port suddenly started generating code
yesterday.
> Which release of GCC is appropriate to our system (sparc - SunOS - 5.6
> and sparc - SunOS - 5.8 operating systems on Sun solaris 2.6 and solaris
>
> 2.8 SUNW, Ultra-5_10 machines) for C code compilation? (Target Intel
> 80188 & 80386 CPUs) (GCC 3.3 ??)
AFAIK, there are no released GCC versions that support pre-i386 x86
targets. DJ Delorie has written a port, but it is old. Someone else
has updated that port (forgot the name momentarily), but I don't know
how well it works.
(I've done a i8086 port pretty much from scratch, and it shows. I have
a cc1 that seems to compile *very* simple code, but the GCC build breaks
when it gets to building libgcc.)
> As we develop real time switch application SW, we have plenty of
> assembler codes. Which release of GNU binutils covers our need on
> assembler compilation? Is GNU binutils 2.14 appropriate to our system?
GNU as does support 16-bit ix86 code; it has for the past three years or
so.
> Thanks in advance.
HAND
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE/g7gU/FmLrNfLpjMRApKvAJ0ZvD4T/YUbmbpDQIEIfMfu6uhvCwCgqN9x
y5bReadS48wQiWvmmd2jCXs=
=2G5s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----