This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:58:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.
(It's properly "RFC" for this kind of message. C is for Comments,
while A is for Approval, as in "patch-included-ok-to-check-in?".
Dan Berlin wants to make you say "[PATCH]" -- don't listen to him! ;-)
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Carlo Wood wrote:
> I worked out several ways to achieve said goal of fixing the
> debug info of calls and inlining,
> (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-09/msg00942.html)
> but in all cases there needs to be a location_t assigned to
> every CALL_EXPR.
Being on the receiving end of faulty inline debug info, I'd say
that fixing such problems would be quite worthwhile!
Unfortunately, I know too little of this area to even answer
To get a patch in in *this* phase, I suggest sending patches
ASAP. (If you did, I guess I missed it.) I suggest being very
careful to follow the contribution guidelines to avoid
unnecessary patch iterations and reviewer badwill.