This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64


On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 02:46:55PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:13:16AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > > Gcc mainline on Sat Sep  6 07:08:21 PDT 2003 failed to bootstrap on
> > > > Linux/ia64. I got
> > > > 
> > > > In file included from /net/gnu/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/libjava/include/jvm.h:23,
> > > >                  from /net/gnu/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/libjava/exception.cc:22:
> > > > ./include/java-threads.h:228: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> > > > Please submit a full bug report,
> > > > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > > > See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> > > 
> > > This appears to be related to change of mine to notice_global_symbol.
> > > I just commited fix to different problem that may fix it.  Can you
> > > please ensure that the following patch is in your tree?
> > >        * cgraph.c (cgraph_mark_reachable_node): Only enqueue finalized functions.
> > >        (cgraph_varpool_finalize_decl): Notice global symbol when needed.
> > > 
> > 
> > The current mainline, on Sat Sep  6 23:22:22 UTC 2003, is even worse.
> > The bootstrap never finished stage1 on Linux/i686 and Linux/ia64:
> > 
> >  9790 ?        S      0:00 make -j 2 -C build-i686-linux bootstrap
> >  20293 ?        S      0:00 /bin/sh -c r=`${PWDCMD-pwd}`; export r;  s=`cd
> >  /expor
> >  20344 ?        S      0:00 make DESTDIR= RPATH_ENVVAR=LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> >  TARGET_SUB
> >  25128 ?        S      0:00 make CC= stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/
> >  -B/usr/gcc-3.4/i686-pc
> >  25658 ?        S      0:00 stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/
> >  -B/usr/gcc-3.4/i686-pc-linux-gn
> >  25659 ?        R    277:24 stage1/gnat1 -I- -I. -Iada
> >  -I/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/
> >  25672 ?        S      0:00 stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/
> >  -B/usr/gcc-3.4/i686-pc-linux-gn
> >  25673 ?        R    277:16 stage1/gnat1 -I- -I. -Iada
> >  -I/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/
> > 
> >  stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/gcc-3.4/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -c -g -O2
> >  -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I. -Iada -I/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/ada
> >  /export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/ada/sem_smem.adb -o ada/sem_smem.o
> >  stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/gcc-3.4/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -c -g -O2
> >  -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I. -Iada -I/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/ada
> >  /export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/ada/sem_type.adb -o ada/sem_type.o
> >  stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/gcc-3.4/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -c -g -O2
> >  -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I. -Iada -I/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/ada
> >  /export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb -o ada/sem_util.o
> 
> I am just testing the attached patch I will commit as obvious if it
> passes.
> It should help you too.
> 

It is still no good. On Linux/i686,

30885 pts/10   S      0:00 stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/gcc-3.4/i686-pc-linux-gn
30886 pts/10   R     65:33 stage1/cc1 -quiet -I. -Ijava -I/export/gnu/src/gcc/gc


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]