This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Stephan Bergmann <stephan.bergmann@sun.com> writes: > Hi Andreas. > > Thanks for your quick reply and clarification. With only a change in > minor (from 3.1 to 3.2), I naively would have assumed that there are > no incompatible changes, at least no backwards incompatible ones. > > Is there any specification of what exactly is guaranteed to work when > mixing different versions of GCC? I am mostly interested in scenarios > of the form "given a (C++) executable built with GCC version X and a > (C++) shared library built with GCC version Y, is it guaranteed that > they can be run together and can interoperate?" (This is the kind of > question that keeps arising for the component-based OpenOffice.org > suite.) I fail to find such information on the GCC web site. The new C++ ABI (and I'm speaking only about C++ here) is quite stable but our C++ developers and testers find often bugs in them - either with the written ABI (so that interoperability with our compilers might be a problem) or with previous versions (were either of them was wrong). In a nutshell: - 3.0 had old libstdc++ - 3.1 has new libstdc++ - 3.2 is ABI incompatible to earlier compilers - 3.3 was expected to be compatible to 3.2 but a few days a bug was found where 3.3 was not compatible to 3.2 (and not anymore to the written ABI). - 3.4 is currently worked on, but will have a newer libstdc++ with a new version number. Currently it is discussed to make it compliant with the C++ ABI and thereby making it incompatible with earlier releases. NOte the 3.3 libstdc++ is only upward compatible, you cannot build a program with the 3.3 libstdc++ and run it with a 3.2 one - the other way round works. In general (unless you hit that bug I mentioned), objects compiled with 3.2 should work with 3.3. Yes, making a web page out of this would be fine, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |