This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
- From: Karel Gardas <kgardas at objectsecurity dot com>
- To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Cc: GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 00:22:48 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Geoff Keating wrote:
> Mark Mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Compile times are another major story. I'm not sure what the full
> > situation is at this point, and I'm not sure we even know what
> > apples-to-apples means. For example, should we assume people will be
> > using PCH?
> I think we should try to make sure that this compiler won't be slower
> even if people don't use PCH, and that when they do use PCH it goes as
> fast as possible. Right now, I'd be quite happy if we just got the
> first part for certain.
Is it ever possible? i.e. I still count gcc2.95.4 as a basis for compile
time performance comparison. These days gcc3.4 is still about 50-100%
slower than this compiler compiling MICO.
Karel Gardas email@example.com
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com